← All proof trees · RANDOLPH TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

4-year cohort graduation rateRANDOLPH TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL, 2012-13

The four-year cohort graduation rate: the share of a 9th-grade entry cohort that graduated within four years. This figure is for english learners.

Identifiers

school code 6090 · metric key graduation_rate_4yr · year 2012-13 · subgroup ELL · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 4-year cohort graduation rate (district file, indexed by cohort entry year; state file, indexed by report year)
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV (all cohorts, 4/5/6-year rates, by subgroup) and store by cohort year.
    2. The state's Future Ready file also carries a 4-year rate for every school including charters; it is stored under the same key but indexed by report year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 4-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    2
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2012-13 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 2 passed
    • passedBase case (district file, 2021-22 cohort): 75 of 75 unsuppressed cells match
    • passedCompleteness

    Checked at ±0.5: 0 mismatches, 0 cells served but absent from the file, 1 in the file but not served (ALL, n/a, latest year).

    Evidence: Base case (district file, 2021-22 cohort) · Completeness

  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats
    • The two publishers' rows never collide on (school, year, subgroup) because they use different year conventions; readers must check which convention a given year follows.
    • Two year conventions coexist under one key — a known v1 wart flagged for normalization.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut86.3%
2010-11Black studentsno population cut86.5%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11White studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut85.9%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut88.0%
2010-11English learnersno population cutwithheld
2010-11Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2010-11Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2010-11Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2010-11Female studentsno population cut92.2%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut81.8%
2011-12All studentsno population cut87.9%
2011-12Black studentsno population cut88.8%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12White studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut89.7%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut82.8%
2011-12English learnersno population cutwithheld
2011-12Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2011-12Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2011-12Female studentsno population cut93.2%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut84.7%
2012-13All studentsno population cut89.6%
2012-13Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Black studentsno population cut88.7%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13White studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut88.5%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut95.5%
2012-13English learnersno population cutwithheld
2012-13Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut84.0%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut90.9%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut96.0%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut85.9%
2013-14All studentsno population cut86.3%
2013-14Black studentsno population cut86.0%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14White studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut86.7%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut85.2%
2013-14English learnersno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut91.3%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut85.1%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut94.3%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut82.9%
2014-15All studentsno population cut87.1%
2014-15Black studentsno population cut88.4%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15White studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut87.0%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut87.5%
2014-15English learnersno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2014-15Students in special educationno population cut91.3%
2014-15Not in special educationno population cut86.2%
2014-15Female studentsno population cut94.6%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut81.6%
2015-16All studentsno population cut77.0%
2015-16American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Black studentsno population cut77.0%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16White studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2015-16English learnersno population cutwithheld
2015-16Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut80.0%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut76.0%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut83.8%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut73.0%
2016-17All studentsno population cut89.7%
2016-17American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Black studentsno population cut89.4%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut89.7%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2016-17Female studentsno population cut95.5%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut87.0%
2017-18All studentsno population cut87.2%
2017-18Black studentsno population cut88.2%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18White studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut87.2%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2017-18Female studentsno population cut100.0%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut76.7%
2018-19All studentsno population cut83.3%
2018-19Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Black studentsno population cut81.3%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not English learnersno population cut83.3%
2018-19Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2018-19Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Male studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20All studentsno population cut79.5%
2019-20Black studentsno population cut79.5%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20White studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2019-20English learnersno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut82.1%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut78.3%
2019-20Female studentsno population cut83.3%
2019-20Male studentsno population cut78.1%
2020-21All studentsno population cut92.9%
2020-21Black studentsno population cut91.3%
2020-21Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21White studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2020-21Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2020-21English learnersno population cutwithheld
2020-21Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2020-21Students in special educationno population cut96.3%
2020-21Not in special educationno population cut91.4%
2020-21Female studentsno population cut90.6%
2020-21Male studentsno population cut94.3%
2021-22All studentsno population cut81.9%
2021-22American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Black studentsno population cut82.2%
2021-22Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22White studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2021-22Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut82.5%
2021-22Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2021-22English learnersno population cutwithheld
2021-22Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2021-22Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2021-22Not in special educationno population cut96.4%
2021-22Female studentsno population cut100.0%
2021-22Male studentsno population cut89.4%
2021-22Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut
2022-23All studentsno population cut73.8%
2022-23American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Black studentsno population cut72.2%
2022-23Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23White studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2022-23Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut88.1%
2022-23Students in special educationno population cut82.6%
2022-23Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut73.3%
2023-24All studentsno population cut74.7%
2023-24American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Black studentsno population cut74.1%
2023-24Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24White studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2023-24Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut73.7%
2023-24Students in special educationno population cut78.1%
2023-24Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut75.3%
2024-25All studentsno population cut88.8%
2024-25American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Black studentsno population cut86.3%
2024-25Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25White studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2024-25Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut90.1%
2024-25Students in special educationno population cut92.6%
2024-25Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut88.4%