← All proof trees · PARKWAY WEST HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

4-year cohort graduation ratePARKWAY WEST HIGH SCHOOL, 2022-23

The four-year cohort graduation rate: the share of a 9th-grade entry cohort that graduated within four years. This figure is for black, hispanic, and multi-racial students combined.

Identifiers

school code 5090 · metric key graduation_rate_4yr · year 2022-23 · subgroup COMBINED_ETHNICITY · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you see4-year cohort graduation rate

    76.8%

    the four-year cohort graduation rate: the share of a 9th-grade entry cohort that graduated within four years.

    vs. peers
    0th percentile
    vs. citywide
    33th percentile
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 4-year cohort graduation rate (district file, indexed by cohort entry year; state file, indexed by report year)
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV (all cohorts, 4/5/6-year rates, by subgroup) and store by cohort year.
    2. The state's Future Ready file also carries a 4-year rate for every school including charters; it is stored under the same key but indexed by report year.

    Citywide percentile, reconstructed right now

    Among 82 default-included schools with a value for this metric, year, and subgroup, this school has a higher value than 27. Midrank rule: (27 + 0/2) / (82 − 1) = 0.333.Stored: 0.333. ✓ matches

    How percentiles are computed · How peer groups are chosen

    Peer percentile, reconstructed right now

    Peer group: up to 40 of the demographically nearest schools among High / selective / district schools; 13 of 13 peers have a value this year. This school is above 0 of them. Midrank: (0 + 0/2) / (14 − 1) = 0.000; stored 0.000. ✓ matches

    The peers and their values (13)

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 4-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    76.8
    denominator
    null (not published)
    suppressed
    false
    citywide_percentile
    0.3333
    comparison_group_percentile
    0.0000
    source_load_id
    e032c169-8d6b-41ae-acc1-d1662894df3e

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-09-08 by futurereadypa_performance.ts
    source id
    futurereadypa_performance_2022-23
    SHA-256 of the file read
    81fdf381405cc672abedc15bd58df21600418ca60df5c72dcf5e865581afb79d
    bytes
    4,888,926
    year covered
    2022-23
    code commit
    c19ea6ec845c65bcc40eb49644be1c7e67b05f25

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileFuture Ready PA Index datafile, 2022-23

    Pennsylvania Department of Education (Future Ready PA Index). Same structure as the 2024-25 file.

    format
    XLSX (wide)
    join key
    AUN + Schl → ULCS
    • Same as 2024-25.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 2 passed
    • passedBase case (district file, 2021-22 cohort): 75 of 75 unsuppressed cells match
    • passedCompleteness

    Checked at ±0.5: 0 mismatches, 0 cells served but absent from the file, 1 in the file but not served (ALL, n/a, latest year).

    Evidence: Base case (district file, 2021-22 cohort) · Completeness

  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats
    • The two publishers' rows never collide on (school, year, subgroup) because they use different year conventions; readers must check which convention a given year follows.
    • Two year conventions coexist under one key — a known v1 wart flagged for normalization.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut82.6%
2010-11Black studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11White studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut82.6%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2010-11Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2010-11Female studentsno population cut86.8%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut77.4%
2011-12All studentsno population cut87.1%
2011-12Black studentsno population cut86.7%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12White studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut88.1%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut84.6%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut87.1%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2011-12Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2011-12Female studentsno population cut90.9%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut81.6%
2012-13All studentsno population cut93.1%
2012-13Black studentsno population cut92.9%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13White studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut93.8%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut90.9%
2012-13English learnersno population cutwithheld
2012-13Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2012-13Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2012-13Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2012-13Female studentsno population cut96.4%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut87.1%
2013-14All studentsno population cut84.9%
2013-14Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Black studentsno population cut86.0%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2013-14English learnersno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2013-14Female studentsno population cut84.8%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut85.0%
2014-15All studentsno population cut62.0%
2014-15American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Black studentsno population cut63.2%
2014-15White studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut56.0%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut76.2%
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut62.0%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2014-15Female studentsno population cut72.5%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut48.4%
2015-16All studentsno population cut79.1%
2015-16Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Black studentsno population cut78.7%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2015-16English learnersno population cutwithheld
2015-16Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2015-16Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2015-16Female studentsno population cut76.7%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut81.1%
2016-17All studentsno population cut80.0%
2016-17Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Black studentsno population cut80.8%
2016-17White studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2016-17English learnersno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2016-17Female studentsno population cut92.6%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut67.9%
2017-18All studentsno population cut84.6%
2017-18Black studentsno population cut84.0%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18White studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2017-18English learnersno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2017-18Female studentsno population cut87.5%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut80.0%
2018-19All studentsno population cut85.5%
2018-19Black studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2018-19English learnersno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2018-19Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Male studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20All studentsno population cut91.1%
2019-20Black studentsno population cut92.3%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20White studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut91.1%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2019-20Female studentsno population cut90.9%
2019-20Male studentsno population cut91.3%
2020-21All studentsno population cut83.7%
2020-21Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Black studentsno population cut82.5%
2020-21Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2020-21English learnersno population cutwithheld
2020-21Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2020-21Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2020-21Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2020-21Female studentsno population cut87.0%
2020-21Male studentsno population cut80.0%
2021-22All studentsno population cut76.9%
2021-22American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Black studentsno population cut76.1%
2021-22Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22White studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2021-22Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut73.0%
2021-22Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2021-22English learnersno population cutwithheld
2021-22Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2021-22Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2021-22Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2021-22Female studentsno population cut96.3%
2021-22Male studentsno population cut79.2%
2021-22Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut
2022-23All studentsno population cut76.8%
2022-23American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Black studentsno population cut78.5%
2022-23Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23White studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2022-23Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut88.1%
2022-23Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2022-23Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut76.8%
2023-24All studentsno population cut81.0%
2023-24American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Black studentsno population cut81.4%
2023-24Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24White studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2023-24Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut83.3%
2023-24Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2023-24Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut82.3%
2024-25All studentsno population cut72.0%
2024-25American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Black studentsno population cut71.7%
2024-25Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25White studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2024-25Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut82.1%
2024-25Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2024-25Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut71.4%