← All proof trees · HORACE FURNESS HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

5-year cohort graduation rateHORACE FURNESS HIGH SCHOOL, 2017-18

The five-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for white students.

Identifiers

school code 2160 · metric key graduation_rate_5yr · year 2017-18 · subgroup WHITE · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 5-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 5-year rate by cohort year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 5-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    20
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2017-18 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut83.8%
2010-11Asian studentsno population cut91.8%
2010-11Black studentsno population cut85.0%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11White studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut85.4%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut81.8%
2010-11English learnersno population cut88.5%
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut77.9%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut62.5%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut87.3%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut88.3%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut80.2%
2011-12All studentsno population cut78.0%
2011-12American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Asian studentsno population cut75.3%
2011-12Black studentsno population cut86.4%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12White studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut78.4%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut77.2%
2011-12English learnersno population cut82.3%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut73.5%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut72.0%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut79.0%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut88.1%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut72.5%
2012-13All studentsno population cut75.8%
2012-13Asian studentsno population cut84.6%
2012-13Black studentsno population cut80.0%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cut63.3%
2012-13White studentsno population cut47.6%
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut75.2%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut77.5%
2012-13English learnersno population cut83.2%
2012-13Not English learnersno population cut67.8%
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut68.0%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut77.1%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut80.0%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut73.5%
2013-14All studentsno population cut73.0%
2013-14Asian studentsno population cut84.8%
2013-14Black studentsno population cut75.0%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cut51.4%
2013-14White studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut78.5%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut58.0%
2013-14English learnersno population cut78.3%
2013-14Not English learnersno population cut64.3%
2013-14Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2013-14Female studentsno population cut86.4%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut65.5%
2014-15All studentsno population cut78.5%
2014-15Asian studentsno population cut92.4%
2014-15Black studentsno population cut80.0%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cut58.7%
2014-15White studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut81.3%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut72.5%
2014-15English learnersno population cut77.8%
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut79.5%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2014-15Female studentsno population cut84.1%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut74.5%
2015-16All studentsno population cut78.6%
2015-16Asian studentsno population cut88.8%
2015-16Black studentsno population cut82.9%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cut56.8%
2015-16White studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut83.8%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut64.7%
2015-16English learnersno population cut77.5%
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut80.3%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut74.1%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut79.4%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut84.7%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut74.8%
2016-17All studentsno population cut71.3%
2016-17Asian studentsno population cut79.8%
2016-17Black studentsno population cut80.8%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cut59.0%
2016-17White studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut81.0%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut65.8%
2016-17English learnersno population cut73.1%
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut77.9%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut65.0%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut76.2%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut74.2%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut68.9%
2017-18All studentsno population cut74.1%
2017-18Asian studentsno population cut83.6%
2017-18Black studentsno population cut82.1%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cut63.8%
2017-18White studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut82.3%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut60.0%
2017-18English learnersno population cut76.7%
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut71.0%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut66.7%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut75.6%
2017-18Female studentsno population cut84.4%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut67.3%
2018-19All studentsno population cut76.3%
2018-19Asian studentsno population cut93.2%
2018-19Black studentsno population cut80.0%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut64.0%
2018-19White studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut88.9%
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cut55.1%
2018-19English learnersno population cut73.8%
2018-19Not English learnersno population cut81.3%
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut77.3%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut76.2%
2018-19Female studentsno population cut84.6%
2018-19Male studentsno population cut71.9%
2019-20All studentsno population cut66.4%
2019-20American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Asian studentsno population cut87.5%
2019-20Black studentsno population cut64.3%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut54.8%
2019-20White studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut77.9%
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cut46.3%
2019-20English learnersno population cut63.3%
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut71.6%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut67.6%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut66.1%
2019-20Female studentsno population cut75.3%
2019-20Male studentsno population cut61.1%
2020-21All studentsno population cut85.3%
2020-21Asian studentsno population cut88.7%
2020-21Black studentsno population cut92.6%
2020-21Hispanic studentsno population cut72.9%
2020-21White studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2020-21Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut87.8%
2020-21Not economically disadvantagedno population cut80.8%
2020-21English learnersno population cut81.9%
2020-21Not English learnersno population cut89.9%
2020-21Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2020-21Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2020-21Female studentsno population cut89.8%
2020-21Male studentsno population cut82.7%