← All proof trees · HORACE FURNESS HIGH SCHOOL
PhiladelphiaOne number, traced
5-year cohort graduation rate — HORACE FURNESS HIGH SCHOOL, 2012-13
The five-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for english learners.
Identifiers
school code 2160 · metric key graduation_rate_5yr · year 2012-13 · subgroup ELL · population cut n/a
- 1What you see5-year cohort graduation rate
83.2%
the five-year cohort graduation rate (district file). Based on 95 students.
- vs. peers
- 82th percentile
- vs. citywide
- 77th percentile
- unit
- percent
- direction
- higher is better
- 2How it was computedvalue = published 5-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
- Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 5-year rate by cohort year.
Citywide percentile, reconstructed right now
Among 14 default-included schools with a value for this metric, year, and subgroup, this school has a higher value than 10. Midrank rule: (10 + 0/2) / (14 − 1) = 0.769.Stored: 0.769. ✓ matches
Peer percentile, reconstructed right now
Peer group: up to 40 of the demographically nearest schools among High / catchment / district schools; 11 of 20 peers have a value this year. This school is above 9 of them. Midrank: (9 + 0/2) / (12 − 1) = 0.818; stored 0.818. ✓ matches
The peers and their values (11)
Peer school Value ABRAHAM LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL 86.1% KENSINGTON HEALTH SCIENCES 85.7% KENSINGTON CAPA 80.0% NORTHEAST HIGH SCHOOL 79.8% GEORGE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL 77.8% JOHN BARTRAM HIGH SCHOOL 76.2% SAMUEL S. FELS HIGH SCHOOL 70.7% FRANKFORD HIGH SCHOOL 68.6% SOUTH PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL 68.0% THOMAS EDISON HIGH SCHOOL 63.2% BENJAMIN FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL 51.0% Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.
- 3The stored cellThe stored cell
- table
- philly_school_year_metrics
- value
- 83.16
- denominator
- 95
- suppressed
- false
- citywide_percentile
- 0.7692
- comparison_group_percentile
- 0.8182
- source_load_id
- 8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1
Evidence: data model overview
- 4The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
- source id
- sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
- SHA-256 of the file read
- 8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
- bytes
- 3,919,459
- year covered
- 2010-11..2021-22
- year of this cell
- 2012-13 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
- code commit
- f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c
To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run
shasum -a 256 <downloaded file>— the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry
- 5The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year
School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.
- format
- CSV
- join key
- ULCS Code
- Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
- 6How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
- ○ not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
- 7Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats
Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.
- District-run schools only.
Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics
The same metric for this school, every year and cut
| Year | Subgroup | Cut | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | All students | no population cut | 83.8% |
| 2010-11 | Asian students | no population cut | 91.8% |
| 2010-11 | Black students | no population cut | 85.0% |
| 2010-11 | Hispanic students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2010-11 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2010-11 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2010-11 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 85.4% |
| 2010-11 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 81.8% |
| 2010-11 | English learners | no population cut | 88.5% |
| 2010-11 | Not English learners | no population cut | 77.9% |
| 2010-11 | Students in special education | no population cut | 62.5% |
| 2010-11 | Not in special education | no population cut | 87.3% |
| 2010-11 | Female students | no population cut | 88.3% |
| 2010-11 | Male students | no population cut | 80.2% |
| 2011-12 | All students | no population cut | 78.0% |
| 2011-12 | American Indian / Alaska Native students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Asian students | no population cut | 75.3% |
| 2011-12 | Black students | no population cut | 86.4% |
| 2011-12 | Hispanic students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 78.4% |
| 2011-12 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 77.2% |
| 2011-12 | English learners | no population cut | 82.3% |
| 2011-12 | Not English learners | no population cut | 73.5% |
| 2011-12 | Students in special education | no population cut | 72.0% |
| 2011-12 | Not in special education | no population cut | 79.0% |
| 2011-12 | Female students | no population cut | 88.1% |
| 2011-12 | Male students | no population cut | 72.5% |
| 2012-13 | All students | no population cut | 75.8% |
| 2012-13 | Asian students | no population cut | 84.6% |
| 2012-13 | Black students | no population cut | 80.0% |
| 2012-13 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 63.3% |
| 2012-13 | White students | no population cut | 47.6% |
| 2012-13 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 75.2% |
| 2012-13 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 77.5% |
| 2012-13 | English learners | no population cut | 83.2% |
| 2012-13 | Not English learners | no population cut | 67.8% |
| 2012-13 | Students in special education | no population cut | 68.0% |
| 2012-13 | Not in special education | no population cut | 77.1% |
| 2012-13 | Female students | no population cut | 80.0% |
| 2012-13 | Male students | no population cut | 73.5% |
| 2013-14 | All students | no population cut | 73.0% |
| 2013-14 | Asian students | no population cut | 84.8% |
| 2013-14 | Black students | no population cut | 75.0% |
| 2013-14 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 51.4% |
| 2013-14 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2013-14 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2013-14 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 78.5% |
| 2013-14 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 58.0% |
| 2013-14 | English learners | no population cut | 78.3% |
| 2013-14 | Not English learners | no population cut | 64.3% |
| 2013-14 | Students in special education | no population cut | withheld |
| 2013-14 | Not in special education | no population cut | withheld |
| 2013-14 | Female students | no population cut | 86.4% |
| 2013-14 | Male students | no population cut | 65.5% |
| 2014-15 | All students | no population cut | 78.5% |
| 2014-15 | Asian students | no population cut | 92.4% |
| 2014-15 | Black students | no population cut | 80.0% |
| 2014-15 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 58.7% |
| 2014-15 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2014-15 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2014-15 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 81.3% |
| 2014-15 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 72.5% |
| 2014-15 | English learners | no population cut | 77.8% |
| 2014-15 | Not English learners | no population cut | 79.5% |
| 2014-15 | Students in special education | no population cut | withheld |
| 2014-15 | Not in special education | no population cut | withheld |
| 2014-15 | Female students | no population cut | 84.1% |
| 2014-15 | Male students | no population cut | 74.5% |
| 2015-16 | All students | no population cut | 78.6% |
| 2015-16 | Asian students | no population cut | 88.8% |
| 2015-16 | Black students | no population cut | 82.9% |
| 2015-16 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 56.8% |
| 2015-16 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2015-16 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2015-16 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 83.8% |
| 2015-16 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 64.7% |
| 2015-16 | English learners | no population cut | 77.5% |
| 2015-16 | Not English learners | no population cut | 80.3% |
| 2015-16 | Students in special education | no population cut | 74.1% |
| 2015-16 | Not in special education | no population cut | 79.4% |
| 2015-16 | Female students | no population cut | 84.7% |
| 2015-16 | Male students | no population cut | 74.8% |
| 2016-17 | All students | no population cut | 71.3% |
| 2016-17 | Asian students | no population cut | 79.8% |
| 2016-17 | Black students | no population cut | 80.8% |
| 2016-17 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 59.0% |
| 2016-17 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2016-17 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2016-17 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 81.0% |
| 2016-17 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 65.8% |
| 2016-17 | English learners | no population cut | 73.1% |
| 2016-17 | Not English learners | no population cut | 77.9% |
| 2016-17 | Students in special education | no population cut | 65.0% |
| 2016-17 | Not in special education | no population cut | 76.2% |
| 2016-17 | Female students | no population cut | 74.2% |
| 2016-17 | Male students | no population cut | 68.9% |
| 2017-18 | All students | no population cut | 74.1% |
| 2017-18 | Asian students | no population cut | 83.6% |
| 2017-18 | Black students | no population cut | 82.1% |
| 2017-18 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 63.8% |
| 2017-18 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2017-18 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2017-18 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 82.3% |
| 2017-18 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 60.0% |
| 2017-18 | English learners | no population cut | 76.7% |
| 2017-18 | Not English learners | no population cut | 71.0% |
| 2017-18 | Students in special education | no population cut | 66.7% |
| 2017-18 | Not in special education | no population cut | 75.6% |
| 2017-18 | Female students | no population cut | 84.4% |
| 2017-18 | Male students | no population cut | 67.3% |
| 2018-19 | All students | no population cut | 76.3% |
| 2018-19 | Asian students | no population cut | 93.2% |
| 2018-19 | Black students | no population cut | 80.0% |
| 2018-19 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 64.0% |
| 2018-19 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2018-19 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2018-19 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 88.9% |
| 2018-19 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 55.1% |
| 2018-19 | English learners | no population cut | 73.8% |
| 2018-19 | Not English learners | no population cut | 81.3% |
| 2018-19 | Students in special education | no population cut | 77.3% |
| 2018-19 | Not in special education | no population cut | 76.2% |
| 2018-19 | Female students | no population cut | 84.6% |
| 2018-19 | Male students | no population cut | 71.9% |
| 2019-20 | All students | no population cut | 66.4% |
| 2019-20 | American Indian / Alaska Native students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2019-20 | Asian students | no population cut | 87.5% |
| 2019-20 | Black students | no population cut | 64.3% |
| 2019-20 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 54.8% |
| 2019-20 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2019-20 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2019-20 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 77.9% |
| 2019-20 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 46.3% |
| 2019-20 | English learners | no population cut | 63.3% |
| 2019-20 | Not English learners | no population cut | 71.6% |
| 2019-20 | Students in special education | no population cut | 67.6% |
| 2019-20 | Not in special education | no population cut | 66.1% |
| 2019-20 | Female students | no population cut | 75.3% |
| 2019-20 | Male students | no population cut | 61.1% |
| 2020-21 | All students | no population cut | 85.3% |
| 2020-21 | Asian students | no population cut | 88.7% |
| 2020-21 | Black students | no population cut | 92.6% |
| 2020-21 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 72.9% |
| 2020-21 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2020-21 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2020-21 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 87.8% |
| 2020-21 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 80.8% |
| 2020-21 | English learners | no population cut | 81.9% |
| 2020-21 | Not English learners | no population cut | 89.9% |
| 2020-21 | Students in special education | no population cut | withheld |
| 2020-21 | Not in special education | no population cut | withheld |
| 2020-21 | Female students | no population cut | 89.8% |
| 2020-21 | Male students | no population cut | 82.7% |