← All proof trees · HIGH SCHOOL OF THE FUTURE

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

4-year cohort graduation rateHIGH SCHOOL OF THE FUTURE, 2019-20

The four-year cohort graduation rate: the share of a 9th-grade entry cohort that graduated within four years. This figure is for english learners.

Identifiers

school code 1030 · metric key graduation_rate_4yr · year 2019-20 · subgroup ELL · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 4-year cohort graduation rate (district file, indexed by cohort entry year; state file, indexed by report year)
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV (all cohorts, 4/5/6-year rates, by subgroup) and store by cohort year.
    2. The state's Future Ready file also carries a 4-year rate for every school including charters; it is stored under the same key but indexed by report year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 4-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    3
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2019-20 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 2 passed
    • passedBase case (district file, 2021-22 cohort): 75 of 75 unsuppressed cells match
    • passedCompleteness

    Checked at ±0.5: 0 mismatches, 0 cells served but absent from the file, 1 in the file but not served (ALL, n/a, latest year).

    Evidence: Base case (district file, 2021-22 cohort) · Completeness

  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats
    • The two publishers' rows never collide on (school, year, subgroup) because they use different year conventions; readers must check which convention a given year follows.
    • Two year conventions coexist under one key — a known v1 wart flagged for normalization.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut71.2%
2010-11Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Black studentsno population cut70.6%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11White studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut69.7%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut75.7%
2010-11English learnersno population cutwithheld
2010-11Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut37.1%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut82.0%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut81.0%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut63.9%
2011-12All studentsno population cut79.9%
2011-12American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Black studentsno population cut79.0%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12White studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut77.6%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut86.0%
2011-12English learnersno population cutwithheld
2011-12Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut48.1%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut86.4%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut77.5%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut82.3%
2012-13All studentsno population cut83.2%
2012-13Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Black studentsno population cut83.5%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13White studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut83.3%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut82.6%
2012-13English learnersno population cutwithheld
2012-13Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut70.8%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut87.0%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut90.2%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut76.0%
2013-14All studentsno population cut73.4%
2013-14Black studentsno population cut74.5%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14White studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut73.6%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut72.7%
2013-14English learnersno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut50.0%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut78.4%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut81.7%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut62.3%
2014-15All studentsno population cut86.3%
2014-15American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Black studentsno population cut85.4%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2014-15English learnersno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2014-15Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2014-15Female studentsno population cut95.2%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut79.3%
2015-16All studentsno population cut82.2%
2015-16Black studentsno population cut82.5%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16White studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut83.1%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut79.2%
2015-16English learnersno population cutwithheld
2015-16Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut57.7%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut90.1%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut83.3%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut81.5%
2016-17All studentsno population cut84.9%
2016-17American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Black studentsno population cut85.9%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17White studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut86.4%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut80.0%
2016-17English learnersno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut66.7%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut89.4%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut94.5%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut74.5%
2017-18All studentsno population cut75.6%
2017-18Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Black studentsno population cut77.6%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18White studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut75.0%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut77.8%
2017-18English learnersno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut53.6%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut82.1%
2017-18Female studentsno population cut81.4%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut67.9%
2018-19All studentsno population cut84.5%
2018-19American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Black studentsno population cut85.8%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2018-19English learnersno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut65.8%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut91.6%
2018-19Female studentsno population cut95.6%
2018-19Male studentsno population cut75.0%
2019-20All studentsno population cut92.4%
2019-20Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Black studentsno population cut94.3%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2019-20English learnersno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2019-20Female studentsno population cut93.5%
2019-20Male studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21All studentsno population cut90.2%
2020-21Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Black studentsno population cut89.7%
2020-21Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21White studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2020-21English learnersno population cutwithheld
2020-21Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2020-21Students in special educationno population cut79.2%
2020-21Not in special educationno population cut92.7%
2020-21Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Male studentsno population cut87.8%
2020-21Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22All studentsno population cut63.7%
2021-22American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Black studentsno population cut66.7%
2021-22Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22White studentsno population cutwithheld
2021-22Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2021-22Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut63.4%
2021-22Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2021-22English learnersno population cutwithheld
2021-22Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2021-22Students in special educationno population cut51.4%
2021-22Not in special educationno population cut97.1%
2021-22Female studentsno population cut96.1%
2021-22Male studentsno population cut92.1%
2021-22Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut
2022-23All studentsno population cut76.8%
2022-23American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Black studentsno population cut80.6%
2022-23Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23White studentsno population cutwithheld
2022-23Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2022-23Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut84.2%
2022-23Students in special educationno population cut72.1%
2022-23Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut77.6%
2023-24All studentsno population cut87.9%
2023-24American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Black studentsno population cut89.3%
2023-24Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24White studentsno population cutwithheld
2023-24Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2023-24Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut91.3%
2023-24Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2023-24Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut87.8%
2024-25All studentsno population cut82.8%
2024-25American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Black studentsno population cut83.1%
2024-25Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25White studentsno population cutwithheld
2024-25Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2024-25Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut85.6%
2024-25Students in special educationno population cut72.0%
2024-25Black, Hispanic, and multi-racial students combinedno population cut82.9%