← All proof trees · GEORGE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

5-year cohort graduation rateGEORGE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL, 2015-16

The five-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for students of two or more races.

Identifiers

school code 8030 · metric key graduation_rate_5yr · year 2015-16 · subgroup TWO_OR_MORE_RACES · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 5-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 5-year rate by cohort year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 5-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    12
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2015-16 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut78.0%
2010-11American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Asian studentsno population cut94.6%
2010-11Black studentsno population cut76.6%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cut84.2%
2010-11White studentsno population cut71.5%
2010-11Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut77.7%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut78.2%
2010-11English learnersno population cut81.6%
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut77.2%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut75.4%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut78.4%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut81.0%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut75.7%
2011-12All studentsno population cut81.8%
2011-12Asian studentsno population cut93.1%
2011-12Black studentsno population cut85.7%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12White studentsno population cut76.1%
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut82.3%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut81.3%
2011-12English learnersno population cut84.9%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut81.4%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut79.1%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut82.3%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut86.3%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut77.8%
2012-13All studentsno population cut74.1%
2012-13American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Asian studentsno population cut87.8%
2012-13Black studentsno population cut73.9%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cut82.3%
2012-13White studentsno population cut67.5%
2012-13Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut71.3%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut78.8%
2012-13English learnersno population cut77.8%
2012-13Not English learnersno population cut73.5%
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut67.9%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut76.5%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut77.5%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut71.4%
2013-14All studentsno population cut79.9%
2013-14American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Asian studentsno population cut92.7%
2013-14Black studentsno population cut75.0%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cut78.0%
2013-14White studentsno population cut80.4%
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut78.0%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut82.0%
2013-14English learnersno population cut88.9%
2013-14Not English learnersno population cut78.1%
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut64.8%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut84.1%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut83.1%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut77.1%
2014-15All studentsno population cut76.3%
2014-15Asian studentsno population cut83.9%
2014-15Black studentsno population cut82.4%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15White studentsno population cut69.5%
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut71.1%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut82.3%
2014-15English learnersno population cut76.8%
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut76.2%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cut61.1%
2014-15Not in special educationno population cut80.5%
2014-15Female studentsno population cut84.3%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut70.2%
2015-16All studentsno population cut79.3%
2015-16Asian studentsno population cut92.2%
2015-16Black studentsno population cut78.9%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16White studentsno population cut77.3%
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut80.7%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut76.9%
2015-16English learnersno population cut85.3%
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut77.6%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut63.0%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut84.1%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut85.3%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut75.5%
2016-17All studentsno population cut78.0%
2016-17Asian studentsno population cut86.5%
2016-17Black studentsno population cut80.8%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17White studentsno population cut78.3%
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut80.0%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut77.3%
2016-17English learnersno population cut82.1%
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut77.3%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut63.6%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut81.7%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut80.0%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut76.4%
2017-18All studentsno population cut71.2%
2017-18American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Asian studentsno population cut87.1%
2017-18Black studentsno population cut63.6%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cut60.0%
2017-18White studentsno population cut74.5%
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut74.6%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut64.8%
2017-18English learnersno population cut74.8%
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut69.4%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut49.1%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut76.4%
2017-18Female studentsno population cut83.9%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut62.7%
2018-19All studentsno population cut78.4%
2018-19Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Black studentsno population cut77.9%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut68.8%
2018-19White studentsno population cut80.0%
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut77.0%
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cut81.3%
2018-19English learnersno population cut82.2%
2018-19Not English learnersno population cut76.8%
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut56.7%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut83.2%
2018-19Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Male studentsno population cut71.0%
2018-19Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20All studentsno population cut76.9%
2019-20Asian studentsno population cut87.9%
2019-20Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Black studentsno population cut83.7%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut64.6%
2019-20White studentsno population cut74.4%
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut76.8%
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cut77.0%
2019-20English learnersno population cut76.4%
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut77.0%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut54.2%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut82.1%
2019-20Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Male studentsno population cut72.6%
2019-20Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21All studentsno population cut85.6%
2020-21Asian studentsno population cut86.0%
2020-21Black studentsno population cut90.0%
2020-21Hispanic studentsno population cut76.9%
2020-21White studentsno population cut91.3%
2020-21Students of two or more racesno population cut66.7%
2020-21Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut84.3%
2020-21Not economically disadvantagedno population cut89.1%
2020-21English learnersno population cut86.8%
2020-21Not English learnersno population cut84.9%
2020-21Students in special educationno population cut56.9%
2020-21Not in special educationno population cut90.3%
2020-21Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Male studentsno population cut83.5%
2020-21Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld