← All proof trees · NORTHEAST HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

5-year cohort graduation rateNORTHEAST HIGH SCHOOL, 2016-17

The five-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for american indian / alaska native students.

Identifiers

school code 8020 · metric key graduation_rate_5yr · year 2016-17 · subgroup AMER_INDIAN_AK_NATIVE · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 5-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 5-year rate by cohort year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 5-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    2
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2016-17 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut78.9%
2010-11American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Asian studentsno population cut89.6%
2010-11Black studentsno population cut79.6%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cut70.7%
2010-11White studentsno population cut69.3%
2010-11Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut77.9%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut80.1%
2010-11English learnersno population cut84.3%
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut77.4%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut73.1%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut79.7%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut82.5%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut75.8%
2011-12All studentsno population cut81.0%
2011-12Asian studentsno population cut89.2%
2011-12Black studentsno population cut87.1%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cut62.0%
2011-12White studentsno population cut82.1%
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cut85.7%
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut77.9%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut85.2%
2011-12English learnersno population cut83.1%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut80.5%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut67.1%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut82.7%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut82.7%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut79.6%
2012-13All studentsno population cut82.0%
2012-13American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Asian studentsno population cut90.8%
2012-13Black studentsno population cut79.0%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cut85.7%
2012-13White studentsno population cut77.0%
2012-13Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut81.5%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut82.7%
2012-13English learnersno population cut79.8%
2012-13Not English learnersno population cut82.8%
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut71.0%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut84.0%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut84.3%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut80.3%
2013-14All studentsno population cut83.4%
2013-14American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Asian studentsno population cut93.0%
2013-14Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Black studentsno population cut79.0%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cut79.3%
2013-14White studentsno population cut78.8%
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cut86.9%
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut85.6%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut79.7%
2013-14English learnersno population cut81.3%
2013-14Not English learnersno population cut84.3%
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut78.1%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut84.4%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut87.9%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut80.0%
2014-15All studentsno population cut85.1%
2014-15Asian studentsno population cut93.0%
2014-15Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Black studentsno population cut85.9%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cut76.5%
2014-15White studentsno population cut85.1%
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut87.2%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut81.8%
2014-15English learnersno population cut78.2%
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut87.3%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cut85.0%
2014-15Not in special educationno population cut85.1%
2014-15Female studentsno population cut89.3%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut81.2%
2015-16All studentsno population cut84.6%
2015-16Asian studentsno population cut90.6%
2015-16Black studentsno population cut80.2%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cut77.0%
2015-16White studentsno population cut92.2%
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cut91.9%
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut86.7%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut79.8%
2015-16English learnersno population cut78.2%
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut87.5%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut79.5%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut85.3%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut88.3%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut81.8%
2016-17All studentsno population cut82.1%
2016-17American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Asian studentsno population cut91.2%
2016-17Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Black studentsno population cut83.3%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cut73.2%
2016-17White studentsno population cut83.1%
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cut75.5%
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut86.2%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut78.4%
2016-17English learnersno population cut81.7%
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut83.6%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut74.1%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut84.0%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut86.8%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut78.8%
2017-18All studentsno population cut80.9%
2017-18American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Asian studentsno population cut88.9%
2017-18Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Black studentsno population cut83.9%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cut67.3%
2017-18White studentsno population cut83.1%
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cut86.1%
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut85.7%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut69.6%
2017-18English learnersno population cut73.7%
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut83.8%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut75.4%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut81.4%
2017-18Female studentsno population cut83.7%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut78.9%
2018-19All studentsno population cut79.8%
2018-19American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Asian studentsno population cut91.5%
2018-19Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Black studentsno population cut85.4%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut65.2%
2018-19White studentsno population cut84.2%
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cut75.0%
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut84.9%
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cut69.1%
2018-19English learnersno population cut63.1%
2018-19Not English learnersno population cut88.8%
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut81.8%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut79.6%
2018-19Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Male studentsno population cut77.2%
2018-19Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20All studentsno population cut81.2%
2019-20Asian studentsno population cut93.2%
2019-20Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Black studentsno population cut89.1%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut62.3%
2019-20White studentsno population cut81.9%
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut84.8%
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cut72.9%
2019-20English learnersno population cut68.2%
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut87.0%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut76.2%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut81.7%
2019-20Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Male studentsno population cut77.2%
2019-20Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21All studentsno population cut90.8%
2020-21American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Asian studentsno population cut95.1%
2020-21Black studentsno population cut94.3%
2020-21Hispanic studentsno population cut84.1%
2020-21White studentsno population cut89.8%
2020-21Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2020-21Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut92.7%
2020-21Not economically disadvantagedno population cut84.8%
2020-21English learnersno population cut84.0%
2020-21Not English learnersno population cut94.9%
2020-21Students in special educationno population cut89.8%
2020-21Not in special educationno population cut90.9%
2020-21Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Male studentsno population cut87.7%
2020-21Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld