← All proof trees · FRANKFORD HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

5-year cohort graduation rateFRANKFORD HIGH SCHOOL, 2016-17

The five-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for american indian / alaska native students.

Identifiers

school code 7010 · metric key graduation_rate_5yr · year 2016-17 · subgroup AMER_INDIAN_AK_NATIVE · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 5-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 5-year rate by cohort year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 5-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    1
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2016-17 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut61.5%
2010-11Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Black studentsno population cut65.2%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cut60.6%
2010-11White studentsno population cut45.0%
2010-11Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut63.8%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut54.5%
2010-11English learnersno population cut63.0%
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut61.3%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut56.1%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut63.2%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut68.7%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut56.4%
2011-12All studentsno population cut58.0%
2011-12Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Black studentsno population cut66.2%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cut50.0%
2011-12White studentsno population cut31.4%
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut58.4%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut56.5%
2011-12English learnersno population cut68.6%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut56.4%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut42.9%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut63.8%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut69.3%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut49.1%
2012-13All studentsno population cut64.2%
2012-13American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Black studentsno population cut68.1%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cut60.5%
2012-13White studentsno population cut56.4%
2012-13Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut64.0%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut64.9%
2012-13English learnersno population cut68.6%
2012-13Not English learnersno population cut63.7%
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut58.5%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut66.7%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut75.2%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut55.8%
2013-14All studentsno population cut65.0%
2013-14Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Black studentsno population cut72.3%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cut60.3%
2013-14White studentsno population cut41.5%
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut65.5%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut63.4%
2013-14English learnersno population cut70.6%
2013-14Not English learnersno population cut63.7%
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut63.0%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut65.8%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut64.2%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut65.7%
2014-15All studentsno population cut61.3%
2014-15American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Black studentsno population cut62.2%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cut62.5%
2014-15White studentsno population cut56.8%
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut60.3%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut64.5%
2014-15English learnersno population cut69.0%
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut59.2%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cut54.5%
2014-15Not in special educationno population cut63.7%
2014-15Female studentsno population cut69.5%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut54.2%
2015-16All studentsno population cut63.6%
2015-16American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Black studentsno population cut64.7%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cut65.3%
2015-16White studentsno population cut46.4%
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut67.0%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut52.5%
2015-16English learnersno population cut75.5%
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut60.5%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut52.0%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut68.8%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut70.7%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut59.1%
2016-17All studentsno population cut68.1%
2016-17American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Black studentsno population cut70.8%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cut64.1%
2016-17White studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut70.7%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut68.8%
2016-17English learnersno population cut70.9%
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut69.8%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut56.9%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut74.1%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut76.0%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut62.7%
2017-18All studentsno population cut64.7%
2017-18Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Black studentsno population cut68.6%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cut60.8%
2017-18White studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut66.5%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut54.8%
2017-18English learnersno population cut75.0%
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut61.9%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut67.7%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut63.2%
2017-18Female studentsno population cut70.1%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut61.4%
2018-19All studentsno population cut63.1%
2018-19American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Black studentsno population cut69.7%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut55.6%
2018-19White studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut63.0%
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cut63.5%
2018-19English learnersno population cut69.2%
2018-19Not English learnersno population cut60.6%
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut50.8%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut68.3%
2018-19Female studentsno population cut66.0%
2018-19Male studentsno population cut60.9%
2019-20All studentsno population cut64.7%
2019-20Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Black studentsno population cut82.7%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut55.3%
2019-20White studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut68.8%
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cut54.4%
2019-20English learnersno population cut53.6%
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut70.8%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut64.1%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut64.9%
2019-20Female studentsno population cut73.9%
2019-20Male studentsno population cut58.9%
2020-21All studentsno population cut76.3%
2020-21American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Black studentsno population cut82.1%
2020-21Hispanic studentsno population cut76.1%
2020-21White studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2020-21Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut77.3%
2020-21Not economically disadvantagedno population cut73.1%
2020-21English learnersno population cut75.3%
2020-21Not English learnersno population cut76.9%
2020-21Students in special educationno population cut77.0%
2020-21Not in special educationno population cut76.0%
2020-21Female studentsno population cut77.0%
2020-21Male studentsno population cut75.8%