← All proof trees · CREATIVE AND PERFORMING ARTS

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

5-year cohort graduation rateCREATIVE AND PERFORMING ARTS, 2015-16

The five-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for female students.

Identifiers

school code 2020 · metric key graduation_rate_5yr · year 2015-16 · subgroup FEMALE · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you see5-year cohort graduation rate

    96.2%

    the five-year cohort graduation rate (district file). Based on 130 students.

    vs. peers
    33th percentile
    vs. citywide
    78th percentile
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 5-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 5-year rate by cohort year.

    Citywide percentile, reconstructed right now

    Among 64 default-included schools with a value for this metric, year, and subgroup, this school has a higher value than 49. Midrank rule: (49 + 0/2) / (64 − 1) = 0.778.Stored: 0.778. ✓ matches

    How percentiles are computed · How peer groups are chosen

    Peer percentile, reconstructed right now

    Peer group: up to 40 of the demographically nearest schools among High / selective / district schools; 12 of 13 peers have a value this year. This school is above 4 of them. Midrank: (4 + 0/2) / (13 − 1) = 0.333; stored 0.333. ✓ matches

    The peers and their values (12)

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 5-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    96.15
    denominator
    130
    suppressed
    false
    citywide_percentile
    0.7778
    comparison_group_percentile
    0.3333
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2015-16 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut93.1%
2010-11Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Black studentsno population cut94.1%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11White studentsno population cut93.2%
2010-11Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut91.4%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut94.2%
2010-11English learnersno population cutwithheld
2010-11Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2010-11Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2010-11Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2010-11Female studentsno population cut93.6%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut91.7%
2011-12All studentsno population cut95.9%
2011-12American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Black studentsno population cut97.9%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12White studentsno population cut93.3%
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut92.4%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut98.9%
2011-12English learnersno population cutwithheld
2011-12Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2011-12Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2011-12Female studentsno population cut95.8%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut96.2%
2012-13All studentsno population cut97.1%
2012-13Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Black studentsno population cut97.8%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cut100.0%
2012-13White studentsno population cut100.0%
2012-13Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut95.3%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut98.8%
2012-13English learnersno population cutwithheld
2012-13Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut93.8%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut97.8%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut96.6%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut98.1%
2013-14All studentsno population cut97.5%
2013-14Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Black studentsno population cut97.7%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14White studentsno population cut95.7%
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut97.5%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut97.6%
2013-14English learnersno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut100.0%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut97.0%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut98.3%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut95.3%
2014-15All studentsno population cut95.3%
2014-15Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Black studentsno population cut96.2%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15White studentsno population cut90.9%
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut93.2%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut97.4%
2014-15English learnersno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2014-15Students in special educationno population cut96.0%
2014-15Not in special educationno population cut95.2%
2014-15Female studentsno population cut93.8%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut100.0%
2015-16All studentsno population cut96.6%
2015-16Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Black studentsno population cut95.7%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cut90.5%
2015-16White studentsno population cut100.0%
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut94.7%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut98.8%
2015-16English learnersno population cutwithheld
2015-16Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut100.0%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut96.1%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut96.2%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut97.9%
2016-17All studentsno population cut96.5%
2016-17Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Black studentsno population cut99.0%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17White studentsno population cut90.0%
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut100.0%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut100.0%
2016-17English learnersno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2016-17Female studentsno population cut96.9%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut95.6%
2017-18All studentsno population cut98.2%
2017-18Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Black studentsno population cut98.0%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18White studentsno population cut97.0%
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut97.9%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut98.6%
2017-18English learnersno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2017-18Female studentsno population cut98.4%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut97.6%
2018-19All studentsno population cut98.4%
2018-19Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Black studentsno population cut96.7%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut100.0%
2018-19White studentsno population cut100.0%
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut97.2%
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cut100.0%
2018-19English learnersno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2018-19Female studentsno population cut98.4%
2018-19Male studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20All studentsno population cut99.5%
2019-20Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Black studentsno population cut98.9%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut100.0%
2019-20White studentsno population cut100.0%
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut100.0%
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cut98.8%
2019-20English learnersno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2019-20Female studentsno population cut99.2%
2019-20Male studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21All studentsno population cut98.8%
2020-21Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Black studentsno population cut98.7%
2020-21Hispanic studentsno population cut95.8%
2020-21White studentsno population cut100.0%
2020-21Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2020-21Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut97.8%
2020-21Not economically disadvantagedno population cut100.0%
2020-21English learnersno population cutwithheld
2020-21Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2020-21Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2020-21Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2020-21Female studentsno population cut98.4%
2020-21Male studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld