← All proof trees · SOUTH PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

5-year cohort graduation rateSOUTH PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL, 2019-20

The five-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for native hawaiian / pacific islander students.

Identifiers

school code 2000 · metric key graduation_rate_5yr · year 2019-20 · subgroup HAWAIIAN_PAC_ISL · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 5-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 5-year rate by cohort year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 5-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    1
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2019-20 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut69.6%
2010-11Asian studentsno population cut70.4%
2010-11Black studentsno population cut74.9%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11White studentsno population cut34.6%
2010-11Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut70.8%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut66.7%
2010-11English learnersno population cut71.3%
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut68.9%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut50.8%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut74.5%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut74.6%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut66.2%
2011-12All studentsno population cut70.4%
2011-12Asian studentsno population cut68.4%
2011-12Black studentsno population cut74.6%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cut52.2%
2011-12White studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut73.1%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut62.9%
2011-12English learnersno population cut63.5%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut72.9%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut71.2%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut70.2%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut76.1%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut66.7%
2012-13All studentsno population cut58.4%
2012-13Asian studentsno population cut59.3%
2012-13Black studentsno population cut62.6%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cut50.0%
2012-13White studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut61.1%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut47.8%
2012-13English learnersno population cut68.0%
2012-13Not English learnersno population cut55.6%
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut51.7%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut60.7%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut61.5%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut56.5%
2013-14All studentsno population cut57.8%
2013-14Asian studentsno population cut62.9%
2013-14Black studentsno population cut61.8%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cut51.7%
2013-14White studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut62.0%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut45.8%
2013-14English learnersno population cut58.8%
2013-14Not English learnersno population cut57.5%
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut54.8%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut58.7%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut59.7%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut56.5%
2014-15All studentsno population cut57.1%
2014-15Asian studentsno population cut62.5%
2014-15Black studentsno population cut67.8%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15White studentsno population cut36.0%
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut56.0%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut59.5%
2014-15English learnersno population cut63.6%
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut55.0%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cut43.2%
2014-15Not in special educationno population cut64.0%
2014-15Female studentsno population cut67.3%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut51.2%
2015-16All studentsno population cut58.5%
2015-16Asian studentsno population cut71.4%
2015-16Black studentsno population cut64.0%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cut45.7%
2015-16White studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut64.2%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut43.8%
2015-16English learnersno population cut66.7%
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut54.7%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut55.8%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut59.7%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut64.3%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut55.6%
2016-17All studentsno population cut58.7%
2016-17American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Asian studentsno population cut50.0%
2016-17Black studentsno population cut67.6%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cut57.1%
2016-17White studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut72.2%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut51.1%
2016-17English learnersno population cut57.5%
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut69.3%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut50.0%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut70.3%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut64.9%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut52.6%
2017-18All studentsno population cut65.3%
2017-18Asian studentsno population cut63.3%
2017-18Black studentsno population cut70.6%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cut60.0%
2017-18White studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut70.7%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut42.9%
2017-18English learnersno population cut58.1%
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut68.3%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut52.6%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut69.8%
2017-18Female studentsno population cut65.2%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut65.3%
2018-19All studentsno population cut66.5%
2018-19Asian studentsno population cut77.8%
2018-19Black studentsno population cut72.3%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut54.4%
2018-19White studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut69.0%
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cut60.7%
2018-19English learnersno population cut59.5%
2018-19Not English learnersno population cut71.8%
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut68.2%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut65.9%
2018-19Female studentsno population cut76.1%
2018-19Male studentsno population cut60.4%
2019-20All studentsno population cut69.8%
2019-20Asian studentsno population cut81.0%
2019-20Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Black studentsno population cut79.6%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut63.6%
2019-20White studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut77.6%
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cut50.0%
2019-20English learnersno population cut66.7%
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut71.9%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut57.9%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut73.9%
2019-20Female studentsno population cut80.3%
2019-20Male studentsno population cut62.5%
2020-21All studentsno population cut72.7%
2020-21Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Black studentsno population cut70.0%
2020-21Hispanic studentsno population cut69.2%
2020-21White studentsno population cutwithheld
2020-21Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2020-21Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut76.9%
2020-21Not economically disadvantagedno population cut50.0%
2020-21English learnersno population cut72.9%
2020-21Not English learnersno population cut72.5%
2020-21Students in special educationno population cut61.2%
2020-21Not in special educationno population cut78.9%
2020-21Female studentsno population cut79.0%
2020-21Male studentsno population cut68.3%