← All proof trees · NORTHEAST HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

6-year cohort graduation rateNORTHEAST HIGH SCHOOL, 2018-19

The six-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for american indian / alaska native students.

Identifiers

school code 8020 · metric key graduation_rate_6yr · year 2018-19 · subgroup AMER_INDIAN_AK_NATIVE · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 6-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 6-year rate by cohort year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 6-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    2
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2018-19 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut80.1%
2010-11American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Asian studentsno population cut91.2%
2010-11Black studentsno population cut80.8%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cut72.8%
2010-11White studentsno population cut69.7%
2010-11Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut79.1%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut81.4%
2010-11English learnersno population cut87.7%
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut78.2%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut76.1%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut80.7%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut83.0%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut77.7%
2011-12All studentsno population cut81.9%
2011-12Asian studentsno population cut89.2%
2011-12Black studentsno population cut87.1%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cut64.1%
2011-12White studentsno population cut83.5%
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cut85.7%
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut79.1%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut85.7%
2011-12English learnersno population cut83.7%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut81.4%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut72.2%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut83.0%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut83.4%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut80.5%
2012-13All studentsno population cut82.7%
2012-13American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Asian studentsno population cut91.5%
2012-13Black studentsno population cut80.3%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cut85.7%
2012-13White studentsno population cut77.7%
2012-13Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut82.6%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut82.8%
2012-13English learnersno population cut79.9%
2012-13Not English learnersno population cut83.8%
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut74.8%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut84.1%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut85.4%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut80.7%
2013-14All studentsno population cut85.3%
2013-14American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Asian studentsno population cut93.0%
2013-14Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Black studentsno population cut84.2%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cut80.5%
2013-14White studentsno population cut80.9%
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cut86.9%
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut87.6%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut81.4%
2013-14English learnersno population cut81.3%
2013-14Not English learnersno population cut86.9%
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut81.3%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut86.0%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut89.1%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut82.3%
2014-15All studentsno population cut86.2%
2014-15Asian studentsno population cut93.5%
2014-15Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Black studentsno population cut87.6%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cut77.4%
2014-15White studentsno population cut85.7%
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut88.3%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut82.8%
2014-15English learnersno population cut79.1%
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut88.4%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cut86.0%
2014-15Not in special educationno population cut86.2%
2014-15Female studentsno population cut90.7%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut82.0%
2015-16All studentsno population cut86.2%
2015-16Asian studentsno population cut90.6%
2015-16Black studentsno population cut84.4%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cut78.6%
2015-16White studentsno population cut92.2%
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cut91.9%
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut92.4%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut85.6%
2015-16English learnersno population cut83.6%
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut92.5%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut83.7%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut90.5%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut90.6%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut82.8%
2016-17All studentsno population cut82.1%
2016-17American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Asian studentsno population cut91.7%
2016-17Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Black studentsno population cut82.1%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cut73.6%
2016-17White studentsno population cut83.7%
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cut77.5%
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut84.2%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut78.4%
2016-17English learnersno population cut80.7%
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut82.6%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut75.6%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut82.8%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut87.3%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut78.6%
2017-18All studentsno population cut82.3%
2017-18American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Asian studentsno population cut89.3%
2017-18Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Black studentsno population cut86.5%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cut69.4%
2017-18White studentsno population cut83.7%
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cut86.1%
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut87.3%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut70.8%
2017-18English learnersno population cut76.0%
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut84.9%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut81.3%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut82.4%
2017-18Female studentsno population cut84.7%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut80.6%
2018-19All studentsno population cut80.6%
2018-19American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Asian studentsno population cut92.5%
2018-19Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Black studentsno population cut86.4%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut65.2%
2018-19White studentsno population cut85.4%
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cut76.9%
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut85.9%
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cut69.4%
2018-19English learnersno population cut64.0%
2018-19Not English learnersno population cut89.5%
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut83.1%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut80.3%
2018-19Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Male studentsno population cut78.1%
2018-19Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20All studentsno population cut84.6%
2019-20Asian studentsno population cut93.7%
2019-20Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Black studentsno population cut91.6%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut68.7%
2019-20White studentsno population cut84.5%
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut86.8%
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cut79.2%
2019-20English learnersno population cut73.6%
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut89.3%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut82.0%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut84.8%
2019-20Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Male studentsno population cut81.3%
2019-20Non-binary studentsno population cutwithheld