← All proof trees · ABRAHAM LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

6-year cohort graduation rateABRAHAM LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL, 2011-12

The six-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for american indian / alaska native students.

Identifiers

school code 8010 · metric key graduation_rate_6yr · year 2011-12 · subgroup AMER_INDIAN_AK_NATIVE · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 6-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 6-year rate by cohort year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 6-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    1
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2011-12 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut68.4%
2010-11American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Asian studentsno population cut69.7%
2010-11Black studentsno population cut79.0%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cut71.1%
2010-11White studentsno population cut56.2%
2010-11Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut69.8%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut65.8%
2010-11English learnersno population cut78.3%
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut67.3%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut70.9%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut67.6%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut70.0%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut66.8%
2011-12All studentsno population cut72.8%
2011-12American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Asian studentsno population cut82.6%
2011-12Black studentsno population cut81.0%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cut70.5%
2011-12White studentsno population cut61.1%
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut74.8%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut68.2%
2011-12English learnersno population cut82.0%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut71.8%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut70.2%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut73.5%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut77.1%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut69.2%
2012-13All studentsno population cut73.7%
2012-13American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Asian studentsno population cut84.0%
2012-13Black studentsno population cut78.7%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cut81.7%
2012-13White studentsno population cut59.8%
2012-13Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut73.3%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut74.6%
2012-13English learnersno population cut86.1%
2012-13Not English learnersno population cut72.3%
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut66.3%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut76.1%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut79.4%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut69.9%
2013-14All studentsno population cut82.3%
2013-14Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Black studentsno population cut83.2%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cut81.6%
2013-14White studentsno population cut81.3%
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut82.8%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut80.9%
2013-14English learnersno population cut84.9%
2013-14Not English learnersno population cut81.8%
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut77.0%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut83.9%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut87.0%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut77.4%
2014-15All studentsno population cut80.3%
2014-15Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Black studentsno population cut84.8%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cut80.9%
2014-15White studentsno population cut71.4%
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut78.6%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut83.5%
2014-15English learnersno population cut84.6%
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut79.1%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cut80.3%
2014-15Not in special educationno population cut80.4%
2014-15Female studentsno population cut85.7%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut75.8%
2015-16All studentsno population cut72.4%
2015-16American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Asian studentsno population cut86.7%
2015-16Black studentsno population cut73.6%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cut69.2%
2015-16White studentsno population cut72.2%
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut83.4%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut69.6%
2015-16English learnersno population cut79.8%
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut77.2%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut78.2%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut77.9%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut78.9%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut67.3%
2016-17All studentsno population cut77.0%
2016-17American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Asian studentsno population cut84.8%
2016-17Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Black studentsno population cut75.6%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cut73.7%
2016-17White studentsno population cut75.0%
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cut95.8%
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut78.9%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut72.7%
2016-17English learnersno population cut74.0%
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut78.2%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut89.7%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut73.9%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut83.1%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut72.0%
2017-18All studentsno population cut71.7%
2017-18Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Black studentsno population cut74.8%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cut70.5%
2017-18White studentsno population cut65.2%
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut74.7%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut62.0%
2017-18English learnersno population cut74.2%
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut71.0%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut74.7%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut71.0%
2017-18Female studentsno population cut78.0%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut65.4%
2018-19All studentsno population cut69.6%
2018-19American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Asian studentsno population cut84.6%
2018-19Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Black studentsno population cut69.3%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut68.2%
2018-19White studentsno population cut66.7%
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut74.8%
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cut56.3%
2018-19English learnersno population cut64.3%
2018-19Not English learnersno population cut71.9%
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut68.6%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut69.8%
2018-19Female studentsno population cut73.5%
2018-19Male studentsno population cut66.8%
2019-20All studentsno population cut75.5%
2019-20American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Asian studentsno population cut90.0%
2019-20Black studentsno population cut81.0%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut70.2%
2019-20White studentsno population cut72.2%
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut78.4%
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cut66.4%
2019-20English learnersno population cut72.7%
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut77.2%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut75.3%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut75.5%
2019-20Female studentsno population cut78.3%
2019-20Male studentsno population cut73.2%