← All proof trees · SAMUEL S. FELS HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

6-year cohort graduation rateSAMUEL S. FELS HIGH SCHOOL, 2010-11

The six-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for students of two or more races.

Identifiers

school code 7120 · metric key graduation_rate_6yr · year 2010-11 · subgroup TWO_OR_MORE_RACES · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 6-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 6-year rate by cohort year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 6-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    8
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2010-11 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut77.0%
2010-11American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Asian studentsno population cut66.0%
2010-11Black studentsno population cut81.9%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cut68.4%
2010-11White studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut74.4%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut81.5%
2010-11English learnersno population cut78.3%
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut76.6%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut72.7%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut77.8%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut79.5%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut75.0%
2011-12All studentsno population cut79.8%
2011-12Asian studentsno population cut78.3%
2011-12Black studentsno population cut83.4%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cut71.2%
2011-12White studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut77.6%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut83.9%
2011-12English learnersno population cut76.5%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut80.6%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut62.5%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut83.6%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut87.7%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut73.9%
2012-13All studentsno population cut76.1%
2012-13Asian studentsno population cut79.3%
2012-13Black studentsno population cut80.9%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cut63.5%
2012-13White studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut76.9%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut74.0%
2012-13English learnersno population cut70.7%
2012-13Not English learnersno population cut77.6%
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut67.7%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut78.7%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut80.5%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut72.7%
2013-14All studentsno population cut77.7%
2013-14American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Black studentsno population cut83.2%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cut68.9%
2013-14White studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut76.7%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut80.3%
2013-14English learnersno population cut82.0%
2013-14Not English learnersno population cut77.0%
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut71.8%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut79.9%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut81.8%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut74.1%
2014-15All studentsno population cut74.5%
2014-15American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Asian studentsno population cut70.0%
2014-15Black studentsno population cut80.7%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cut64.5%
2014-15White studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut71.3%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut79.2%
2014-15English learnersno population cut73.8%
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut74.7%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cut63.0%
2014-15Not in special educationno population cut77.2%
2014-15Female studentsno population cut83.2%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut67.4%
2015-16All studentsno population cut73.8%
2015-16Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Black studentsno population cut79.3%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cut67.3%
2015-16White studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut79.7%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut71.2%
2015-16English learnersno population cut87.2%
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut74.1%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut64.6%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut80.8%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut86.4%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut59.0%
2016-17All studentsno population cut77.6%
2016-17Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Black studentsno population cut79.0%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cut66.2%
2016-17White studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut80.0%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut72.6%
2016-17English learnersno population cut82.8%
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut75.0%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut63.3%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut81.0%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut81.2%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut74.7%
2017-18All studentsno population cut75.5%
2017-18Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Black studentsno population cut76.9%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cut75.0%
2017-18White studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut78.6%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut67.7%
2017-18English learnersno population cut79.5%
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut73.8%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut74.5%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut75.8%
2017-18Female studentsno population cut78.3%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut73.2%
2018-19All studentsno population cut71.1%
2018-19Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Black studentsno population cut81.3%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut56.8%
2018-19White studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut74.3%
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cut64.4%
2018-19English learnersno population cut67.7%
2018-19Not English learnersno population cut73.5%
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut62.7%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut74.1%
2018-19Female studentsno population cut75.5%
2018-19Male studentsno population cut67.9%
2019-20All studentsno population cut73.0%
2019-20Asian studentsno population cut85.0%
2019-20Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Black studentsno population cut83.0%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut58.8%
2019-20White studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut80.1%
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cut54.4%
2019-20English learnersno population cut65.4%
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut78.8%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut62.5%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut75.5%
2019-20Female studentsno population cut75.9%
2019-20Male studentsno population cut70.3%