← All proof trees · KENSINGTON HIGH SCHOOL
PhiladelphiaOne number, traced
6-year cohort graduation rate — KENSINGTON HIGH SCHOOL, 2016-17
The six-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for economically disadvantaged students.
Identifiers
school code 5700 · metric key graduation_rate_6yr · year 2016-17 · subgroup ECON_DISADV · population cut n/a
- 1What you see6-year cohort graduation rate
81.3%
the six-year cohort graduation rate (district file). Based on 112 students.
- vs. peers
- 80th percentile
- vs. citywide
- 49th percentile
- unit
- percent
- direction
- higher is better
- 2How it was computedvalue = published 6-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
- Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 6-year rate by cohort year.
Citywide percentile, reconstructed right now
Among 48 default-included schools with a value for this metric, year, and subgroup, this school has a higher value than 23. Midrank rule: (23 + 0/2) / (48 − 1) = 0.489.Stored: 0.489. ✓ matches
Peer percentile, reconstructed right now
Peer group: up to 40 of the demographically nearest schools among High / catchment / district schools; 15 of 20 peers have a value this year. This school is above 12 of them. Midrank: (12 + 0/2) / (16 − 1) = 0.800; stored 0.800. ✓ matches
The peers and their values (15)
Peer school Value ROXBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL 88.9% KENSINGTON CAPA 84.6% NORTHEAST HIGH SCHOOL 84.2% SAMUEL S. FELS HIGH SCHOOL 80.0% GEORGE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL 79.3% ABRAHAM LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL 78.9% WEST PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL 76.6% HORACE FURNESS HIGH SCHOOL 76.0% JOHN BARTRAM HIGH SCHOOL 75.7% SAYRE HIGH SCHOOL 75.3% FRANKFORD HIGH SCHOOL 71.1% SOUTH PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL 69.2% OVERBROOK HIGH SCHOOL 67.7% THOMAS EDISON HIGH SCHOOL 64.1% MARTIN L. KING HIGH SCHOOL 54.8% Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.
- 3The stored cellThe stored cell
- table
- philly_school_year_metrics
- value
- 81.25
- denominator
- 112
- suppressed
- false
- citywide_percentile
- 0.4894
- comparison_group_percentile
- 0.8000
- source_load_id
- 8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1
Evidence: data model overview
- 4The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
- source id
- sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
- SHA-256 of the file read
- 8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
- bytes
- 3,919,459
- year covered
- 2010-11..2021-22
- year of this cell
- 2016-17 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
- code commit
- f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c
To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run
shasum -a 256 <downloaded file>— the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry
- 5The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year
School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.
- format
- CSV
- join key
- ULCS Code
- Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
- 6How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
- ○ not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
- 7Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats
Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.
- District-run schools only.
Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics
The same metric for this school, every year and cut
| Year | Subgroup | Cut | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | All students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2010-11 | Black students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2010-11 | Hispanic students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2010-11 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2010-11 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2010-11 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | withheld |
| 2010-11 | Not English learners | no population cut | withheld |
| 2010-11 | Students in special education | no population cut | withheld |
| 2010-11 | Male students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | All students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Asian students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Black students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Hispanic students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | English learners | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Not English learners | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Students in special education | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Not in special education | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Female students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2011-12 | Male students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | All students | no population cut | 70.0% |
| 2012-13 | Asian students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | Black students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | Hispanic students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | English learners | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | Not English learners | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | Students in special education | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | Not in special education | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | Female students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2012-13 | Male students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2013-14 | All students | no population cut | 84.7% |
| 2013-14 | Asian students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2013-14 | Black students | no population cut | 75.0% |
| 2013-14 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 88.7% |
| 2013-14 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2013-14 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2013-14 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 81.7% |
| 2013-14 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 100.0% |
| 2013-14 | English learners | no population cut | 91.3% |
| 2013-14 | Not English learners | no population cut | 83.3% |
| 2013-14 | Students in special education | no population cut | 75.6% |
| 2013-14 | Not in special education | no population cut | 89.5% |
| 2013-14 | Female students | no population cut | 93.1% |
| 2013-14 | Male students | no population cut | 78.1% |
| 2014-15 | All students | no population cut | 76.6% |
| 2014-15 | Asian students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2014-15 | Black students | no population cut | 84.8% |
| 2014-15 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 72.7% |
| 2014-15 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2014-15 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2014-15 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 73.0% |
| 2014-15 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 85.7% |
| 2014-15 | English learners | no population cut | 68.8% |
| 2014-15 | Not English learners | no population cut | 79.3% |
| 2014-15 | Students in special education | no population cut | 62.5% |
| 2014-15 | Not in special education | no population cut | 83.3% |
| 2014-15 | Female students | no population cut | 76.9% |
| 2014-15 | Male students | no population cut | 76.4% |
| 2015-16 | All students | no population cut | 72.5% |
| 2015-16 | Black students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2015-16 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 78.6% |
| 2015-16 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2015-16 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 84.1% |
| 2015-16 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 61.9% |
| 2015-16 | English learners | no population cut | 77.3% |
| 2015-16 | Not English learners | no population cut | 79.4% |
| 2015-16 | Students in special education | no population cut | 64.3% |
| 2015-16 | Not in special education | no population cut | 85.5% |
| 2015-16 | Female students | no population cut | 86.2% |
| 2015-16 | Male students | no population cut | 66.7% |
| 2016-17 | All students | no population cut | 74.8% |
| 2016-17 | Asian students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2016-17 | Black students | no population cut | 83.8% |
| 2016-17 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 71.3% |
| 2016-17 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2016-17 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2016-17 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | 81.3% |
| 2016-17 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | 51.6% |
| 2016-17 | English learners | no population cut | 72.1% |
| 2016-17 | Not English learners | no population cut | 76.0% |
| 2016-17 | Students in special education | no population cut | 57.9% |
| 2016-17 | Not in special education | no population cut | 81.0% |
| 2016-17 | Female students | no population cut | 87.0% |
| 2016-17 | Male students | no population cut | 67.4% |
| 2017-18 | All students | no population cut | 72.2% |
| 2017-18 | Asian students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2017-18 | Black students | no population cut | 73.9% |
| 2017-18 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 72.1% |
| 2017-18 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2017-18 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2017-18 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2017-18 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | withheld |
| 2017-18 | English learners | no population cut | 77.4% |
| 2017-18 | Not English learners | no population cut | 70.1% |
| 2017-18 | Students in special education | no population cut | 61.3% |
| 2017-18 | Not in special education | no population cut | 76.6% |
| 2017-18 | Female students | no population cut | 81.1% |
| 2017-18 | Male students | no population cut | 67.6% |
| 2018-19 | All students | no population cut | 69.9% |
| 2018-19 | Asian students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2018-19 | Black students | no population cut | 69.2% |
| 2018-19 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 69.1% |
| 2018-19 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2018-19 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2018-19 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | withheld |
| 2018-19 | English learners | no population cut | 66.7% |
| 2018-19 | Not English learners | no population cut | 70.7% |
| 2018-19 | Students in special education | no population cut | 61.8% |
| 2018-19 | Not in special education | no population cut | 73.9% |
| 2018-19 | Female students | no population cut | 77.1% |
| 2018-19 | Male students | no population cut | 66.2% |
| 2019-20 | All students | no population cut | 76.7% |
| 2019-20 | American Indian / Alaska Native students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2019-20 | Asian students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2019-20 | Black students | no population cut | 83.3% |
| 2019-20 | Hispanic students | no population cut | 75.0% |
| 2019-20 | White students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2019-20 | Students of two or more races | no population cut | withheld |
| 2019-20 | Economically disadvantaged students | no population cut | withheld |
| 2019-20 | Not economically disadvantaged | no population cut | withheld |
| 2019-20 | English learners | no population cut | 85.3% |
| 2019-20 | Not English learners | no population cut | 71.4% |
| 2019-20 | Students in special education | no population cut | 73.3% |
| 2019-20 | Not in special education | no population cut | 78.3% |
| 2019-20 | Female students | no population cut | 89.2% |
| 2019-20 | Male students | no population cut | 67.9% |