← All proof trees · JULES MASTBAUM HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

6-year cohort graduation rateJULES MASTBAUM HIGH SCHOOL, 2010-11

The six-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for not english learners.

Identifiers

school code 5060 · metric key graduation_rate_6yr · year 2010-11 · subgroup NOT_ELL · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 6-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 6-year rate by cohort year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 6-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    185
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2010-11 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut89.0%
2010-11Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Black studentsno population cut90.0%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cut86.2%
2010-11White studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut88.2%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut92.3%
2010-11English learnersno population cutwithheld
2010-11Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut77.8%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut90.8%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut89.6%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut88.3%
2011-12All studentsno population cut87.0%
2011-12Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Black studentsno population cut88.9%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cut81.4%
2011-12White studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut86.2%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut90.3%
2011-12English learnersno population cut84.0%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut87.5%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut80.7%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut88.5%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut85.9%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut88.0%
2012-13All studentsno population cut85.6%
2012-13Black studentsno population cut88.9%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13White studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2012-13English learnersno population cutwithheld
2012-13Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2012-13Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2012-13Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2012-13Female studentsno population cut91.5%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut80.7%
2013-14All studentsno population cut87.1%
2013-14Black studentsno population cut86.8%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cut86.7%
2013-14White studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2013-14English learnersno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut76.0%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut89.9%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut94.5%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut81.2%
2014-15All studentsno population cut91.8%
2014-15Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Black studentsno population cut95.7%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cut86.8%
2014-15White studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2014-15English learnersno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2014-15Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2014-15Female studentsno population cut97.2%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut88.7%
2015-16All studentsno population cut86.1%
2015-16Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Black studentsno population cut90.7%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cut83.6%
2015-16White studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut92.7%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut75.0%
2015-16English learnersno population cut90.5%
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut89.3%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut92.9%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut88.7%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut90.3%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut82.6%
2016-17All studentsno population cut90.8%
2016-17Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Black studentsno population cut92.5%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cut90.0%
2016-17White studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2016-17English learnersno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut91.2%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut90.7%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut90.0%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut91.2%
2017-18All studentsno population cut82.6%
2017-18American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Black studentsno population cut88.7%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cut72.6%
2017-18White studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2017-18English learnersno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2017-18Female studentsno population cut89.1%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut76.5%
2018-19All studentsno population cut77.2%
2018-19Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Black studentsno population cut85.7%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut68.6%
2018-19White studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2018-19English learnersno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut85.7%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut75.0%
2018-19Female studentsno population cut77.3%
2018-19Male studentsno population cut77.2%
2019-20All studentsno population cut85.6%
2019-20Asian studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Black studentsno population cut84.4%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut86.2%
2019-20White studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2019-20English learnersno population cut85.0%
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut85.7%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut100.0%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut81.3%
2019-20Female studentsno population cut87.5%
2019-20Male studentsno population cut84.2%