Find What Works: Schools

← All proof trees · STRAWBERRY MANSION HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

6-year cohort graduation rate — STRAWBERRY MANSION HIGH SCHOOL, 2011-12

The six-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for black students.

Identifiers

school code 4140 · metric key graduation_rate_6yr · year 2011-12 · subgroup BLACK · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you see6-year cohort graduation rate

    46.8%

    the six-year cohort graduation rate (district file). Based on 94 students.

    vs. peers
    0th percentile
    vs. citywide
    17th percentile
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 6-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 6-year rate by cohort year.

    Citywide percentile, reconstructed right now

    Among 55 default-included schools with a value for this metric, year, and subgroup, this school has a higher value than 9. Midrank rule: (9 + 0/2) / (55 − 1) = 0.167.Stored: 0.167. ✓ matches

    How percentiles are computed · How peer groups are chosen

    Peer percentile, reconstructed right now

    Peer group: up to 40 of the demographically nearest schools among High / catchment / district schools; 17 of 20 peers have a value this year. This school is above 0 of them. Midrank: (0 + 0/2) / (18 − 1) = 0.000; stored 0.000. ✓ matches

    The peers and their values (17)
    Peer schoolValue
    HORACE FURNESS HIGH SCHOOL88.6%
    NORTHEAST HIGH SCHOOL87.1%
    KENSINGTON CAPA86.1%
    GEORGE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL85.7%
    SAMUEL S. FELS HIGH SCHOOL83.4%
    ABRAHAM LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL81.0%
    KENSINGTON HEALTH SCIENCES80.8%
    ROXBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL80.3%
    SOUTH PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL75.2%
    WEST PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL74.8%
    JOHN BARTRAM HIGH SCHOOL70.6%
    BENJAMIN FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL69.3%
    FRANKFORD HIGH SCHOOL68.5%
    MARTIN L. KING HIGH SCHOOL65.5%
    OVERBROOK HIGH SCHOOL64.5%
    THOMAS EDISON HIGH SCHOOL60.3%
    SAYRE HIGH SCHOOL56.4%

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 6-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    46.81
    denominator
    94
    suppressed
    false
    citywide_percentile
    0.1667
    comparison_group_percentile
    0.0000
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    file URL
    https://cdn.philasd.org/offices/performance/Open_Data/School_Performance/Graduation_Rates/OD_SDP_Graduation_Rates_School_S_2026-02-12.csv
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2011-12 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    landing page
    https://opendataphilly.org/datasets/sdp-school-performance/
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • ○ not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut52.3%
2010-11Black studentsno population cut52.3%
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut52.3%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut34.5%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut58.8%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut67.3%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut38.6%
2011-12All studentsno population cut44.5%
2011-12American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Black studentsno population cut46.8%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12White studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut42.9%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut50.0%
2011-12English learnersno population cutwithheld
2011-12Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut40.5%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut46.9%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut46.5%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut43.1%
2012-13All studentsno population cut51.1%
2012-13Black studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13White studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2012-13Not English learnersno population cut51.1%
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut38.7%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut57.4%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut62.9%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut43.9%
2013-14All studentsno population cut63.4%
2013-14Black studentsno population cut63.2%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14White studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not English learnersno population cut63.4%
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut46.1%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut68.6%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut79.5%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut52.9%
2014-15All studentsno population cut54.5%
2014-15American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Black studentsno population cut56.8%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15White studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut54.5%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cut54.2%
2014-15Not in special educationno population cut54.7%
2014-15Female studentsno population cut65.1%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut44.4%
2015-16All studentsno population cut68.8%
2015-16Black studentsno population cut67.9%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut73.7%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2015-16Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2015-16Female studentsno population cut79.3%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut59.4%
2016-17All studentsno population cut63.5%
2016-17Black studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17White studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut63.5%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2016-17Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2016-17Female studentsno population cut76.9%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut50.0%
2017-18All studentsno population cut65.3%
2017-18Black studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18White studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut65.3%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut66.7%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut64.0%
2017-18Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Male studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19All studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Black studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not English learnersno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2018-19Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2018-19Female studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Male studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20All studentsno population cut78.4%
2019-20Black studentsno population cut81.4%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20White studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cutwithheld
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut78.4%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut76.2%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut80.0%
2019-20Female studentsno population cut75.9%
2019-20Male studentsno population cut81.8%