← All proof trees · HORACE FURNESS HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

6-year cohort graduation rateHORACE FURNESS HIGH SCHOOL, 2013-14

The six-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for students in special education.

Identifiers

school code 2160 · metric key graduation_rate_6yr · year 2013-14 · subgroup IEP · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 6-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 6-year rate by cohort year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 6-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    16
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2013-14 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut85.3%
2010-11Asian studentsno population cut91.8%
2010-11Black studentsno population cut87.2%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11White studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut88.2%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut81.8%
2010-11English learnersno population cut88.5%
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut81.1%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut68.2%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut87.8%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut90.7%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut81.0%
2011-12All studentsno population cut79.6%
2011-12American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Asian studentsno population cut76.1%
2011-12Black studentsno population cut88.6%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12White studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut80.2%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut78.6%
2011-12English learnersno population cut82.8%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut76.3%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut76.9%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut80.1%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut89.8%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut74.1%
2012-13All studentsno population cut76.8%
2012-13Asian studentsno population cut86.7%
2012-13Black studentsno population cut80.0%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cut63.3%
2012-13White studentsno population cut47.6%
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut76.5%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut77.5%
2012-13English learnersno population cut84.2%
2012-13Not English learnersno population cut68.6%
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut70.8%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut77.7%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut82.8%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut73.5%
2013-14All studentsno population cut74.9%
2013-14Asian studentsno population cut86.4%
2013-14Black studentsno population cut83.3%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cut51.4%
2013-14White studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut81.7%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut57.7%
2013-14English learnersno population cut78.3%
2013-14Not English learnersno population cut69.1%
2013-14Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2013-14Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2013-14Female studentsno population cut86.6%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut68.1%
2014-15All studentsno population cut80.0%
2014-15Asian studentsno population cut92.4%
2014-15Black studentsno population cut88.9%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cut58.7%
2014-15White studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut83.5%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut72.5%
2014-15English learnersno population cut77.8%
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut82.9%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2014-15Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2014-15Female studentsno population cut84.1%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut76.9%
2015-16All studentsno population cut80.8%
2015-16Asian studentsno population cut90.6%
2015-16Black studentsno population cut88.2%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cut55.8%
2015-16White studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut97.0%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut78.7%
2015-16English learnersno population cut88.5%
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut92.4%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cutwithheld
2015-16Not in special educationno population cutwithheld
2015-16Female studentsno population cut84.7%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut78.2%
2016-17All studentsno population cut70.9%
2016-17Asian studentsno population cut79.8%
2016-17Black studentsno population cut78.6%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cut58.1%
2016-17White studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut76.0%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut60.8%
2016-17English learnersno population cut69.0%
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut73.6%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut75.0%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut70.5%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut73.5%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut68.8%
2017-18All studentsno population cut74.5%
2017-18Asian studentsno population cut83.6%
2017-18Black studentsno population cut85.2%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cut63.8%
2017-18White studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut82.3%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut61.0%
2017-18English learnersno population cut76.7%
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut72.0%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut69.2%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut75.6%
2017-18Female studentsno population cut83.1%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut68.8%
2018-19All studentsno population cut77.2%
2018-19Asian studentsno population cut93.2%
2018-19Black studentsno population cut87.0%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut64.0%
2018-19White studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut90.4%
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cut55.1%
2018-19English learnersno population cut73.8%
2018-19Not English learnersno population cut83.9%
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut81.0%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut76.7%
2018-19Female studentsno population cut85.9%
2018-19Male studentsno population cut72.5%
2019-20All studentsno population cut68.7%
2019-20American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Asian studentsno population cut89.1%
2019-20Black studentsno population cut72.0%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut55.9%
2019-20White studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut80.9%
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cut47.4%
2019-20English learnersno population cut64.5%
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut76.3%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut75.8%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut67.4%
2019-20Female studentsno population cut74.7%
2019-20Male studentsno population cut64.9%