← All proof trees · SOUTH PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL

PhiladelphiaOne number, traced

6-year cohort graduation rateSOUTH PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL, 2019-20

The six-year cohort graduation rate (district file). This figure is for students of two or more races.

Identifiers

school code 2000 · metric key graduation_rate_6yr · year 2019-20 · subgroup TWO_OR_MORE_RACES · population cut n/a

  1. 1
    What you seeWithheld by the publisher

    The publisher suppressed this cell (too few students to report). The site stores it as suppressed and never as zero.

    vs. peers
    vs. citywide
    unit
    percent
    direction
    higher is better
  2. 2
    How it was computedvalue = published 6-year cohort graduation rate, by cohort entry year
    1. Read the district's graduation CSV and store the 6-year rate by cohort year.

    Note: stored percentiles are computed by a batch script after loads; a difference from the live reconstruction means a newer load changed the comparison set and the batch has not been re-run.

    Evidence: metric tree: 6-year cohort graduation rate

  3. 3
    The stored cellThe stored cell
    table
    philly_school_year_metrics
    value
    null
    denominator
    3
    suppressed
    true
    citywide_percentile
    null
    comparison_group_percentile
    null
    source_load_id
    8ecdf1ea-7780-4200-bd21-8e8d089c99f1

    Evidence: data model overview

  4. 4
    The load that wrote itWritten on 2026-06-04 by sdp_graduation.ts
    source id
    sdp_graduation_school_2014-2025
    SHA-256 of the file read
    8ae3969118c3a9f01e4d8d04aa634855571ab71e914f3d2b689ad811d5639225
    bytes
    3,919,459
    year covered
    2010-11..2021-22
    year of this cell
    2019-20 — this measure is stored under a different year than the file's report year; see the metric page
    code commit
    f75e33137e8166eec3f8b5a4b39463d306ef710c

    To confirm you have the same file: download it from the URL above, then run shasum -a 256 <downloaded file> — the output should equal the hash above. If the publisher has since replaced the file, the hashes will differ, which is itself useful to know.

    Evidence: loader script · first-fetch findings for this file · source registry

  5. 5
    The publisher's fileGraduation rates by cohort, 4/5/6-year

    School District of Philadelphia (Performance Office). Four-, five-, and six-year cohort graduation rates by school and subgroup, indexed by the cohort's 9th-grade entry year.

    format
    CSV
    join key
    ULCS Code
    • Indexed by cohort start year, not graduation year; the state's Future Ready file indexes the same rate by report year.
  6. 6
    How it was checkedChecks: 0 passed, 1 not run
    • not runSame file and loader as graduation_rate_4yr (base case passed); not separately reconciled
  7. 7
    Assumptions & caveatsAssumptions and caveats

    Stored as published; no modeling assumptions.

    • District-run schools only.

    Algorithms involved: Citywide and peer-group percentiles, Peer groups: 40 nearest neighbors on demographics

The same metric for this school, every year and cut

YearSubgroupCutValue
2010-11All studentsno population cut71.0%
2010-11Asian studentsno population cut70.4%
2010-11Black studentsno population cut77.3%
2010-11Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2010-11White studentsno population cut34.6%
2010-11Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2010-11Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut72.9%
2010-11Not economically disadvantagedno population cut66.7%
2010-11English learnersno population cut71.3%
2010-11Not English learnersno population cut70.9%
2010-11Students in special educationno population cut55.6%
2010-11Not in special educationno population cut74.8%
2010-11Female studentsno population cut75.8%
2010-11Male studentsno population cut67.7%
2011-12All studentsno population cut70.7%
2011-12Asian studentsno population cut68.4%
2011-12Black studentsno population cut75.2%
2011-12Hispanic studentsno population cut52.2%
2011-12White studentsno population cutwithheld
2011-12Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2011-12Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut74.0%
2011-12Not economically disadvantagedno population cut61.0%
2011-12English learnersno population cut63.1%
2011-12Not English learnersno population cut73.7%
2011-12Students in special educationno population cut73.1%
2011-12Not in special educationno population cut70.0%
2011-12Female studentsno population cut76.1%
2011-12Male studentsno population cut67.1%
2012-13All studentsno population cut60.2%
2012-13Asian studentsno population cut59.3%
2012-13Black studentsno population cut64.2%
2012-13Hispanic studentsno population cut58.3%
2012-13White studentsno population cutwithheld
2012-13Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2012-13Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut62.9%
2012-13Not economically disadvantagedno population cut50.0%
2012-13English learnersno population cut70.0%
2012-13Not English learnersno population cut57.3%
2012-13Students in special educationno population cut56.9%
2012-13Not in special educationno population cut61.4%
2012-13Female studentsno population cut62.6%
2012-13Male studentsno population cut58.7%
2013-14All studentsno population cut60.0%
2013-14Asian studentsno population cut62.9%
2013-14Black studentsno population cut63.6%
2013-14Hispanic studentsno population cut59.3%
2013-14White studentsno population cutwithheld
2013-14Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2013-14Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut65.2%
2013-14Not economically disadvantagedno population cut45.8%
2013-14English learnersno population cut63.3%
2013-14Not English learnersno population cut58.8%
2013-14Students in special educationno population cut56.1%
2013-14Not in special educationno population cut61.1%
2013-14Female studentsno population cut61.3%
2013-14Male studentsno population cut59.0%
2014-15All studentsno population cut60.8%
2014-15Asian studentsno population cut66.7%
2014-15Black studentsno population cut67.2%
2014-15Hispanic studentsno population cutwithheld
2014-15White studentsno population cut47.8%
2014-15Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2014-15Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut59.1%
2014-15Not economically disadvantagedno population cut64.3%
2014-15English learnersno population cut66.7%
2014-15Not English learnersno population cut58.8%
2014-15Students in special educationno population cut53.7%
2014-15Not in special educationno population cut64.0%
2014-15Female studentsno population cut67.3%
2014-15Male studentsno population cut56.8%
2015-16All studentsno population cut59.5%
2015-16Asian studentsno population cut74.1%
2015-16Black studentsno population cut66.3%
2015-16Hispanic studentsno population cut45.7%
2015-16White studentsno population cutwithheld
2015-16Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2015-16Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut77.1%
2015-16Not economically disadvantagedno population cut47.3%
2015-16English learnersno population cut72.0%
2015-16Not English learnersno population cut63.4%
2015-16Students in special educationno population cut63.4%
2015-16Not in special educationno population cut67.3%
2015-16Female studentsno population cut65.5%
2015-16Male studentsno population cut56.6%
2016-17All studentsno population cut60.7%
2016-17American Indian / Alaska Native studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Asian studentsno population cut51.7%
2016-17Black studentsno population cut70.3%
2016-17Hispanic studentsno population cut59.3%
2016-17White studentsno population cutwithheld
2016-17Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2016-17Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut69.2%
2016-17Not economically disadvantagedno population cut41.3%
2016-17English learnersno population cut58.0%
2016-17Not English learnersno population cut62.0%
2016-17Students in special educationno population cut52.6%
2016-17Not in special educationno population cut63.4%
2016-17Female studentsno population cut67.1%
2016-17Male studentsno population cut54.5%
2017-18All studentsno population cut67.4%
2017-18Asian studentsno population cut67.9%
2017-18Black studentsno population cut72.7%
2017-18Hispanic studentsno population cut64.3%
2017-18White studentsno population cutwithheld
2017-18Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2017-18Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut72.3%
2017-18Not economically disadvantagedno population cut46.1%
2017-18English learnersno population cut64.1%
2017-18Not English learnersno population cut68.7%
2017-18Students in special educationno population cut57.6%
2017-18Not in special educationno population cut70.5%
2017-18Female studentsno population cut67.7%
2017-18Male studentsno population cut67.1%
2018-19All studentsno population cut70.1%
2018-19Asian studentsno population cut77.8%
2018-19Black studentsno population cut79.2%
2018-19Hispanic studentsno population cut56.4%
2018-19White studentsno population cutwithheld
2018-19Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2018-19Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut73.1%
2018-19Not economically disadvantagedno population cut63.6%
2018-19English learnersno population cut61.0%
2018-19Not English learnersno population cut77.3%
2018-19Students in special educationno population cut81.6%
2018-19Not in special educationno population cut66.9%
2018-19Female studentsno population cut80.9%
2018-19Male studentsno population cut63.2%
2019-20All studentsno population cut71.5%
2019-20Asian studentsno population cut81.0%
2019-20Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Black studentsno population cut78.6%
2019-20Hispanic studentsno population cut66.1%
2019-20White studentsno population cutwithheld
2019-20Students of two or more racesno population cutwithheld
2019-20Economically disadvantaged studentsno population cut77.5%
2019-20Not economically disadvantagedno population cut55.0%
2019-20English learnersno population cut67.7%
2019-20Not English learnersno population cut74.2%
2019-20Students in special educationno population cut63.2%
2019-20Not in special educationno population cut74.3%
2019-20Female studentsno population cut82.0%
2019-20Male studentsno population cut64.4%